Big broker with tinpot workshop style
The IP was the same. From the database, the order #195136392 was closed after #195135833, which proved that only I could operated LOGS. But it was different form that in Exness since mine was 17:29:40 Trade: '9175616': close order #195135833 buy 0.10 USOILm at 12.762 sl: 0.000 tp: 0.000 at price 0.000. So there must be problems with the database in Exness . In addition, there was no #195136392 in my database. How could I place the second order within 5ms? Why do you think ur database is accurate? As a big broker, onus on you is to compensate not to shirk.
The following is the original recommendation
exness大平台小作坊
首先IP是一致的,并且这个#195136392订单从你数据库来看是开在关闭 195135833之前的,这更能证明我的MT4的LOGS是唯一的,只有我一个人在操作,LOGS是没有问题的。但是我的LOGS和你的数据库不一致。我的logs给你的命令是 17:29:40 Trade: '9175616': close order #195135833 buy 0.10 USOILm at 12.762 sl: 0.000 tp: 0.000 at price 0.000 但是你的数据库里面价格却不是这样的,这就证明你的数据库有问题。并且我的LOGS里面没有这个#195136392订单。两个订单时间相差不到5毫秒(ms),这个订单也不是我预先设定的。这么短的时间没有可能去登录或者去下这个订单。为什么会出来这个订单[3f]你们不值得深思吗?为什么你们就觉得以你们的数据库为准?那要MT4的LOGS有什么用?这不是你们的理由!
作为一个这麽大的平台,应该有这样的能力去赔付,而不是去推卸责任,你的数据库有这个订单,就是有,我的LOGS没有啊,并且是一个IP,我的LOGS肯定是准的呀!你们为啥